1980 State papers: Did Thatcher consider withdrawal?

  The release of State Papers from 1980 has shed further light on British government policy during the course of the Troubles. The Socialist Party has always argued that the British state above all acted in its own interests -in the interests of capitalism – during this period. The Papers add to the evidence which supports this analysis. In 1979 the Thatcher government came to power. In the same year the Provisional IRA, reorganised into a cell structure after it suffered significant setbacks in the period after the 1974-1975 ceasefire, launched a new offensive.

By 1980 this offensive was already running out of steam. In 1980 and 1981 the two hunger strikes allowed the leadership of the Provisional’s to accidentally stumble onto the new strategy of “the armalite and ballot box”.


Thatcher provided Sinn Fein with this opportunity by taking a hardline stance over the hunger strikes and her regime was of course marked by vicious attacks on working class people. Her position on the North however was essentially pragmatic. Like British governments before and after it leant on the majority Protestant population to maintain stability. This meant that the Catholic population suffered repression, though periodic attempts were made to accommodate Catholics to the Northern state.

In early 1980 the SDLP, the Alliance Party and the DUP entered negotiations on power sharing convened by Secretary of State Humphrey Atkins. The talks were boycotted by the Official Unionists and Sinn Fein was excluded. After some months the talks collapsed without agreement. In the aftermath of the talks the Northern Ireland Office body the Central Secretariat drew up a list of “fall-back solutions”.

Amongst the options considered was a united Ireland:

“The Government could decide to have a fundamental look at the constitutional status of NI and perhaps to start moving in the direction of Irish Unity or some new relationship between GB and Ireland.”

“Such a policy would, of course, fly in the face of the approaches followed by successive British Governments and would in all probability provoke a violent unionist backlash. It is not, therefore, “a starter”.”

The significance of this is that the option of a united Ireland was on the table at all. The Republican leadership justified the IRA campaign on the basis that the British state wanted to hold onto Northern Ireland for its own interests and would only withdraw at the point of a gun. The sharp repression meted out by the British government appeared to support this view. The reality however was that the British government, even the right-wing Thatcher administration, was prepared to consider withdrawal but could not take even one step in this direction because of the danger of a Protestant backlash, civil war and re-partition. The IRA campaign did not weaken Britain’s resolve but made it even more difficult for it to consider the option of withdrawal.

Thirty years later there is apparent “agreement” at Stormont. There is no real agreement however and the problems working people face are as acute as ever. Today, as in 1980, the only solution is unity, the unity of working class people in Northern Ireland, the unity of the working class on the island of Ireland , and unity with the working class of Scotland, Wales and England, in a common struggle against the cuts and for a socialist future.


Previous Article

Social workers set for strike action against cuts

Next Article

Defend rural libraries from closure

Related Posts

Unison general secretary election – Prentis vote falls despite Con-Dem attacks

As reported in last week's Socialist, Unison general secretary Dave Prentis was re-elected to his position in the recent ballot, but with fewer votes than when he last stood in 2005.

The drop in votes for Dave Prentis was in the region of 21%, disproportionate to the fall in the turn-out in the election, from 16% to 14.6%, and is despite the fact that the election took place after the general election, when the threat of the Con-Dem attacks on public sector workers might have been expected to rally Unison members behind the union and its leadership.

We live in a political world: Bob Dylan and the Communist Party

This autumn saw the death of Irwin Silber who, as a member of the American Young Communist League and editor of the US folk-music magazine Sing Out! in the 1960s, arguably began the campaign against Bob Dylan for allegedly ‘betraying’ the radical movements of that decade. FRANK RILEY, a former Labour deputy leader of West Lancashire council, looks at the relationship between Dylan and the Communist Party.

Seldom has a popular artist received such venomous attacks and opprobrium than Bob Dylan on his appearance at Newport Folk Festival in May 1965 and after when he ‘went electric’. Indeed, this continued for years, and even has echoes today. Dylan’s performance at Newport had tremendous repercussions, not only in the folk music world, but throughout popular music based on American traditions, especially rock music.

Biggest ever earthquake could result in “tens of thousands” dead and nuclear nightmare


Capitalist system incapable of facing up to natural disasters – democratic control of reconstruction and relief work needed

The massive earthquake that struck north-eastern Japan on Friday 11 March and ensuing destruction caused by one of the most powerful tsunamis ever witnessed was the “worst crisis since 1945” according to Prime Minister, Naoto Kan. Capitalist governments always try to exploit for their own political reasons the spontaneous mood for unity in the face of disaster. The terrible events in Japan, however, raise many questions about the follies of capitalism and especially the massive development of nuclear power, never entirely safe, in a notoriously quake-prone region. Government officials say the death toll from the earthquake and tsunami could reach tens of thousands. As Reuters noted, “The catastrophe will also sorely test Kan’s deeply unpopular government.”