US – Fight for Full LGBT Equality!

Being an LGBT person means facing discrimination in the workplace, bullying at school and in many cases from family members, not being able to marry your loved one legally, and being faced with higher rates of suicide and homelessness (between 20 and 40 percent of homeless youth identify as LGBT).

Since getting elected with the support and money of the LGBT community, Obama has done little more than pay lip service to LGBT issues. He has consistently refused to support Gay Marriage (supporting only “civil unions”). In the more than a year that the Democrats have controlled the White House and Congress, the Defense Of Marriage Act (DOMA) – banning gay marriages from being federally recognized – has not been repealed, and the Employee Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), which would federally ban employment discrimination against LGBT people, has not been enacted. Even Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell (DADT) – which bans LGBT people from openly serving in the military – has been slightly weakened but has not been repealed.

All this further shows that the tactic of quietly asking Democrats to help while funding them with millions of Gay dollars is not and will not be successful. Instead, it is necessary to challenge the Democrats with  a strong movement in the streets. We have seen the first steps of this with the protests that happened nationwide after the passage of Proposition 8 in California, banning Gay Marriage in that state, in 2008, the National Equality March in Washington, D.C., in October of last year, and a series of regional conferences of LGBT activists this spring.

A national week of action is planned starting May 17 – International Day Against Homophobia – and ending May 22, the birthday of Harvey Milk, a slain San Francisco LGBT rights activist from the ‘70s who at the time stood up to the Democratic Party higher-ups and put the question of LGBT equality on the table. These are good steps forward, but a real movement will need to be built that really challenges the Democrats. This needs to be built by holding protests in the street, building local LGBT activist groups, and linking up the LGBT struggle with other progressive struggles like the labor movement.

The need for a massive jobs program, for real universal single-payer health care, for an end to evictions and foreclosures, and for an end to outrageous bailouts of major banks are issues that affect all working-class people and youth, irrespective of sexual orientation. Fighting together on these issues can provide the basis for building a powerful movement to force a change in policy in Washington, D.C. We also need to challenge the Democrats electorally, running genuine activists as candidates up against the Democrats. It’s not enough to simply say “don’t vote Democrat”: alternative candidates need to be put forward. We need to build a movement that supports demands including full federal employment and marriage equality, funding for social services like youth centers for LGBT youth and all youth, homeless shelters, and free, quality health care for all.

However, as long as we still live under capitalism – a system that is based on dividing and conquering working people along lines like race, gender, and sexual orientation – we will never be able to achieve true equality for LGBT people.

Total
0
Shares
Previous Article

Pensions face axe as Cowen orders €3 billion cuts!

Next Article

Why public sector cuts are not inevitable

Related Posts

Peter Hadden’s writings online at Marxist Internet Archive

Socialist writings on Ireland and the national question

Peter Hadden, who served for many years on the Socialist Party National Executive Committee and held the post of Northern Secretary, as well as on the CWI’s International Executive Committee, sadly died last May. 2011 sees the welcome development of Peter’s many articles and pamphlets being posted on the Marxists Internet Archive (MIA - www.marxists.org) a widely-read site which makes accessible the works of a large variety of Marxist writings. 

BA strike – An industrial dictatorship

“The strictest law often causes the most serious wrong.”
Cicero


Earlier this evening British Airways was granted an injunction against a proposed 20 day strike by cabin crew. The decision was based on a technicality regarding the method UNITE used to inform cabin crew of the result of the ballot. This judgement has enormous implications for the whole of the trade union movement. For all practical purpose effective strike action that seriously damages the financial interests of the employer is now illegal. It was Tony Blair who once boasted that Britain had the most restrictive anti-trade union laws in the Western World. This judgement now relegates Britain below many neo-colonial countries in terms of trade union rights.

Visit airSTRIKE for up to date reports of the strike

No democratic mandate for water charges

The anti-water charges We Won’t Pay Campaign has responded to speculation that water charges may be introduced next year by warning the Northern Ireland Executive that they “will be met with mass civil disobedience if water charges are imposed on people.”

Gary Mulcahy, spokesperson for the anti-water charges campaign added “There is no mandate to introduce water charges. It would be totally undemocratic to impose this tap tax on households. At the last Assembly elections the politicians were left in no doubt that people are strongly opposed to water charges.

Britain after the election: “Deeper & tougher” cuts than under Thatcher

As we go to press, the outcome of the general election is very difficult to predict. The Tories are ahead in the polls but their lead is slipping and a clear Tory majority looks increasingly uncertain. The Tories need to climb an electoral mountain to win enough seats to form a majority government. At the present time, opinion polls suggest they may do it but the memory of the Thatcher years has not faded for millions of voters, especially working class voters. Now that the Tories have taken off the mask and appear as they truly are, the outcome of the election is much more uncertain. A certain swing back to Labour, especially amongst working class voters, is clearly discernible.