Trade unionists denounce Hutton’s attacks on public sector workers’ pensions

Former Labour minister Lord Hutton, on a comfortable MP’s pension, has released an interim report on his investigation into public sector pensions. To nobody’s surprise, he has declared that workers should pay more and work longer to earn a lower pension.

He admits that pensions of public-sector workers are far from “gold plated”, with the average being around £7,800 a year. But he is still calling for major cuts. Three public sector union leaders and activists give their first reactions to this report, all in a personal capacity.

“These proposals are another attempt to make working people pay for the greed of the bankers and big business.

Public sector pensions, covering overwhelmingly low paid workers, cost £4 billion, yet tax relief for the richest 1% costs us £10 billion.

The TUC must now coordinate a united response, including coordinated industrial action, to defeat this coalition of millionaires.
John McInally, Vice president, Public and Commercial Services union

“The attack on public sector pensions suggested in the interim report of former New Labour minister Hutton focuses on higher contributions, increasing the retirement age and an end to final salary schemes.

It was the threat of strike action, and in the case of the local government scheme actual strike action, that protected the schemes in their current forms.
quote closing

Hutton and his Con-Dem bosses must understand that further attacks on the schemes should be met” with strike action across the public sector.
Roger Bannister, UNISON national executive

“It’s quite clear that Hutton is testing the water. He’s raised all the threats that we expected but not made any definite proposals.

I think the unions have to respond very quickly and show we will react very sharply. The unions have to pull together to make absolutely clear that we are not prepared to accept any increase in the retirement age or any suggestion that teachers and other workers have to pay more for a smaller pension.

That means preparing joint activities and joint rallies to prepare the ground for joint strike action if the government goes ahead with these proposals next year.

The government want to say that public sector pensions need to be cut to pay for the problems of the economy.

We know that many private sector workers have had their pension schemes cut. But that is because of private sector corporations taking pension ‘holidays’ in order to chase profits.

We don’t want public sector workers to be hit in the same way but losing our pensions is going to do nothing to help private sector pensioners.

In fact it’s the opposite – fighting for our pensions is the best way of showing to all workers that we have to oppose the cuts that are coming.

Hutton is saying that public sector workers have got to pay more for their pensions. But actually hidden in the report are projections which confirm details about the pension deal the unions came to back in 2005/6.

This said that contributions should only go up if the valuations of the schemes showed it was necessary.

Actually the valuations show that there is no need to increase contributions. This is purely an attack to try to rip off public sector workers, not to pay for pensions but to pay for the hole in the economy caused by the bosses’ crisis.
Martin Powell-Davies, National Union of Teachers national executive

Total
0
Shares
Previous Article

Fight the cuts - Make the bankers & rich pay

Next Article

Browne Report - Unlimited fees will cut off higher education for young people

Related Posts

East Belfast: Services under attack

With harsher spending cuts in the pipeline, the Assembly’s current batch of cutbacks are already hitting schools and other educational facilities hard in East Belfast. In July, with construction set to begin, the Education Minister Caitriona Ruane announced that Strandtown Primary School would not be getting the new school building it was promised years ago.

Now in August, Victoria Park primary School has also been told work on its much needed new purpose-built building has been postponed. The fact that these two nearby primary schools have both been denied funding compounds the longstanding neglect of primary education in East Belfast.

Deal won’t deliver for working class

On 5 February the DUP and Sinn Fein agreed a deal on policing, justice and parades. The deal was announced in triumph as a “historic breakthrough” by Peter Robinson and Martin McGuinness sitting along side Gordon Brown and Brian Cowen. Policing and justice will be transferred to local control by 12 April and the issue of contentious parades will be reviewed over the next three weeks by a “working party”. On 9 March an Assembly vote will be required to agree the package.

Divide and rule – Labour & partition in Irish History

Introduction
The partition of Ireland was a conscious act on the part of British imperialism chiefly intended to divide the working class along sectarian lines. As the recent troubles have made the publication of works on Irish history more profitable, a host of academics have presented ever newer accounts of the division of the country. In the midst of this welter of publication the above straightforward fact about partition has often been lost sight of. In particular this has been the case among those who have spent their energies seeking some justification to rationalize and excuse the division of Ireland, so that they, in turn, may excuse themselves from opposing this division. Above all, this is true of those who justify partition with the completely false idea that the division of the country somehow reflects the existence of two separate nations in Ireland.

 

Review: Is Red Plenty possible?

The planned economy and the struggle for socialism (first published in Socialism Today)

Red Plenty, by Francis Spufford, mixes fact and fiction to describe post-second world war Russia. The author sets out to expose Stalinist mismanagement and authoritarian rule – and, by extension, any notion of socialist planning. Inadvertently, however, he also shows the great potential of socialism – if it were truly run under the democratic control of the working class. PETER TAAFFE reviews this fascinating book.