Tory budget will hit women hardest

The budget to be announced in October is set to slash public services. This will not only amount to thousands of job losses, but to an essential loss of services and benefits for the most vulnerable in society. Women still face inequality today due to low paid, part time work, lack of child care facilities etc. The emergency budget from May only exacerbates the existing inequalities of income between men and women.

A study by the House of Commons library states that of the £8 billion raised by the budget changes in direct taxes and benefits, £5.8 billion will be paid by women, and only £2.2 billion by men.

Child benefits will be frozen for three years. With rises in VAT and inflation, this reduces the real income of all mothers. Pregnant women will lose the “Health in Pregnancy benefit” and the “Sure Start Maternity Grant” will now be limited to the first child.

Lone parents, 90% of whom are women, will be required to look for paid work when their youngest child reaches the age of 5. But public expenditure cuts will result in fewer jobs and less child care provisions being available. Furthermore if you’re on Jobseekers Allowance for over a year, your housing benefit will be cut by 10%. This means a real decline in income for single parents unable to find paid work compatible with their child care responsibilities.  Currently three out of four single parent households in Northern Ireland live in poverty. This will only increase.

In Britain, about two-thirds of the 2.1 million pensioners living in poverty are women. Social care services for the elderly, from care homes to meals-on-wheels will be hit hard by the cuts, putting more pressure on family carers (mainly women).
Tighter criteria for Disability Living Allowance (DLA) may not only lead to loss of income for people with a disability. It will also effect the eligibility for Carer’s Allowance (CA) – three quarters of CA recipients are women.

On average, women do 2 hours more unpaid work a day than men. The cut in vital public and social services, will see an increase of this unpaid labour. The main profiteer of this inequality is the capitalist system. It suits the ruling class to have women carrying out unpaid labour in the isolation of their homes instead of carrying out that work as part of an organised, paid workforce. Our trade unions need to fight back and organise the members, male and female, against the slaughter of our social and public services.

Previous Article

Medical secretaries fight jobs & pay cuts

Next Article

Women and the struggle against oppression

Related Posts

Thomas Cook – A courageous struggle

The significance of the Thomas Cook occupation cannot be overstated. At the time of writing the issue of redundancy payments is not resolved but already the struggle has exposed the pro-big business nature of the courts and the Gardai. Crucially it was a victory of the spirit of the workers and showed the extraordinary ability of people to fight to defend their rights.

Twenty-eight workers arrested and dragged through the courts in scenes more common in far away dictatorial regimes. The Thomas Cook occupation showed that “social partnership” does not exist. It also illustrated the anger that working class people feel at being made pay the price for the crisis through job cuts and attacks on rights. When told that the company was going to close with immediate effect the workers occupied the building.

Riot police attack workers’ protest at Durban stadium

South African riot police fired tear gas on hundreds of security stewards protesting against wage cuts, 90 minutes after the match between Germany and Australia in Durban.

“They’re giving us 205 rand [around €20]; we started at 12 noon and worked until midnight”, Sikhumbuzo Mnisi, a 44-year-old from Durban claimed, according to the New York Times, “Different things have been said to people, but we were promised 1,500 rand (around 140 Euro) per day”. He reported: “We started to protest because we wanted to negotiate.”

Hughes Christensen: No more job losses in East Belfast

The political parties in the Assembly Executive were today accused of “gross negligence for their complete lack of action to save jobs at Hughes Christensen factory” in East Belfast.


Tommy Black, Socialist Party representative claimed “East Belfast cannot afford anymore job losses. Industry has been decimated over the years and the Assembly parties have done nothing to create decent jobs for ordinary people. The politicians in Stormont care more about wealthy property developers than workers.

Pat Lawlor to fight for West Belfast Assembly seat


The Socialist Party is to stand Pat Lawlor for West Belfast in the Assembly elections on May 5th. He has already been selected as the Party's candidate for Lower Falls in the local election. Pat is a neo-natal nurse and trade union representative in the Royal Victoria Hospital, playing a leading role in exposing and campaigning against attacks on the health service in the Belfast Trust.