Time to plan for all-out postal strike

 Editorial, The Socialist (Socialist Party England & Wales) The third week of national strike action at Royal Mail has seen the bosses on the run. They fear the disruption of mail in the pre-Christmas period when over two billion letters, cards and parcels are processed through the system. They thought they could force the union into making more concessions just as they did in the 2007 deal, which many postal workers (and how right they were) feared was the thin edge of the wedge. The plans of Royal Mail to cut jobs, intensify workloads and drive working conditions back into the Victorian age have been completely exposed by their actions since the 2007 deal.

The mass strikes have stopped the bosses in their tracks. They thought they could rule the roost and do what they like. Their plan was to break the union and introduce a complete change in everyday working arrangements to have the ‘right to manage’ without interference from the union or its reps.

Mark Higson, managing director of Royal Mail, said in frustration that the strikes “distract” from the peace efforts. He meant that the strikes have stopped the bosses from implementing their plans. Without the threat and reality of the strikes the union would have been defeated long ago.

The solidarity of the strikers and the support they are getting from other workers has opened up the possibility of a famous victory if the CWU leadership shows the same determination in negotiations as their members have shown on the picket lines.

The week before last, the union leaders thought they had a form of words that meant they could call off the strikes to continue talks. But the Royal Mail bosses tried to go too far; they said that the deal was no more than an acceptance by the union to have negotiations without any strikes.
This would have given the bosses all they want, as they have probably got most of the changes they want this side of Christmas through already. Their reported intention is once Christmas is out of the way, to again move onto the offensive and continue their programme of job cuts and heavier workloads for those who would be left. This would include the gradual adoption of new machinery in mail centres with most Royal Mail jobs becoming part-time and back-breaking delivery loads further increasing.

Unfortunately, Dave Ward, CWU deputy general secretary and a leading negotiator in the talks, was quoted in the press complaining that one problem is that because the union reps are subject to annual election, they are in “perpetual election mode” and therefore have to listen to their members. He told The Guardian that the union is “prepared to hold elections less frequently to improve relations with management”.

However, the postal executive of the CWU stopped the union’s negotiators accepting the bosses’ recent proposals and instead insisted that there is a bottom line beyond which they are not prepared to go. This included that Royal Mail should stop hiring temporary staff meant to break the strike, a commitment not to continue with privatisation plans and an agreement that postal staff would be paid overtime to clear up the growing backlog of postal items.

The Tories, from the sidelines, have threatened that once in power they will sort out the union once and for all by fully privatising the post service. To encourage the would-be privateers, the £10 billion pension deficit will be covered by a Tory government, so the privateers will be guaranteed all the profits while taxpayers fund the losses.

Tory proposals

Also, the Tories want to change the law to stop strike action if there is not a majority of the workforce in favour. The percentage of CWU postal workers who voted was 67%, and of them, 76% voted for strike action, but this would only just be enough because the Tories want all those who do not vote to be deemed as against.

One Tory academic even proposed that such measures should be spread across the whole public sector to stop strikes. He proposed that future national strike ballots in local government should only be effective if there is a majority in each council in favour, not as at present where all the votes across all councils are counted together and a simple majority decides the issue.

The announced post strikes this week and next (Friday 6 November and Monday 9 November) will for the first time involve all CWU members in Royal Mail coming out together. This is a recognition that sectional strikes of sorting offices one day and delivery offices the next have not been enough.

But it is becoming increasingly clear as well that single day strikes may not be enough either. If, after this weekend, the bosses have not agreed to end their attacks, the postal executive of the CWU should be prepared to call an all-out strike until they do.

The CWU members are fighting for all the public sector unions. If the other unions stand to one side and allow the government to beat the postal workers then it will come after the rest of the sector sooner or later. There should be a clear message going out from the CWU leadership to the other unions that it is time to give greater support to the struggle.

The letter to The Guardian that was signed by some union leaders was regrettable because it blamed the union as well as the bosses for the situation. The time for half measures is over. The postal workers have shown that they will fight back in a united fashion, now all the public sector unions should give full support, and prepare the ground for a one-day public sector strike in defence of jobs and public services.

The CWU should organise city wide rallies and demos in support of the postal workers. At these the CWU should call for solidarity of all workers in defence of the public sector as a whole. And now is the time to consider stepping up the action to an all-out post strike until victory is won.


Total
0
Shares
Previous Article

Northern Ireland - Assembly parties deliver cuts & sectarianism

Next Article

Youth campaign for jobs slams Minster for Employment’s “vampire” comments

Related Posts

PCS Budget Day action

Following their well-supported two day strike on 8 and 9 March, up to 200,000 civil servants in the PCS union will be on strike again on budget day - Wednesday 24 March. This action is to defend contracts that guarantee a certain level of redundancy pay if civil servants lose their jobs.

The vast majority of civil servants are on low pay. They refuse to sit back and see their contracts ripped up because of an economic crisis not of their making, while the bankers are again making vast profits and paying themselves obscene bonuses. When working people demanded that bankers have their bonuses stopped, Labour ministers argued it could not be done because they have legally binding contracts: the hypocrisy is sickening!

Victoria Primary School latest victim of Assembly cuts

East Belfast Socialist Party spokesperson and education worker Tommy Black today attacked Minister Caitriona Ruane after revealing that promised new school buildings in East Belfast will now be scrapped.

The decision by the Minister to scrap plans to build a much needed new building at Victoria primary school is a slap in the face for the local community. Assembly cuts have already led to the closure of Beechfield Primary School, the closure of Ballymacarratt Library, funding cuts to the Playzone facility at Ballymac Community Centre and also the scrapping of new buildings at Strandtown Primary school.

Water charges need to be scrapped, not just delayed

Anti-water charges campaigners reacted to yesterday’s announcement from the Northern Ireland Executive that water charges are to be deferred for another year by calling for water charges to be scrapped rather than delayed.

Gary Mulcahy, speaking on behalf of the We Won’t Pay Campaign explained “It is disappointing that the NI Executive has only announced the deferral of water charges. This means that water bills will be sent to people’s homes in April 2010. People are already struggling to pay the bills with soaring increases in energy costs. Another bill in the form of water charges is not acceptable, especially since we already pay for water through our rates.

 

Should fascists be allowed free speech?

Reproduced below is a pamphlet written by Mick Barry a member of both Youth Against Racism Europe (YRE) and Militant from October 1993. YRE was a campaign organised by young people across Europe to oppose the rise of far right organisations like the British National Party and the NPD in Germany. The pamphlet deals with the question that came up amongst some young people about whether fascists should be allowed free speech.

Should fascists be allowed free speech?

The visit of Nazi historian David Irving to Ireland raises the issue of how to combat fascism. Our anti-fascist campaigning work show is that 99% of ordinary people are hostile to fascism. However, people are divided on how to challenge it.