Sinn Féin’s neo-liberal economic “alternative”

Sinn Féin recently published it’s policy paper “There is a Better Way”, a plan for the cuts which offered a few populist measures as window-dressing e.g. a marginal pay-cut for MLAs, reduced use of business consultants and slashing bonuses to hospital consultants. But aside from these few populist policies, the document is a 100% acceptance of the cuts agenda.

Early on it states “We fundamentally disagree with the Tory government’s slash and burn approach to the economic crisis, but we are nevertheless forced to deal with the consequences of its approach.” Sinn Féin plans to quietly administer the cuts, safeguard business interests and slash workers wages hoping that big business will eventually be attracted to set up here and exploit local workers. Meanwhile, they will make a big play of their “opposition” locally and hope to prevent any political fallout.

Regressive Taxes
The document proposes a number of regressive taxes e.g. on plastic bags (raising £5 million) and on mobile phone masts. The latter will simply result in phone companies passing on the costs to consumers and in rural areas masts may be removed altogether. Instead of shilly-shallying around the telecoms giants, the industry should be nationalised and democratised to ensure all profits are either reinvested in improving local infrastructure or to supporting public services.

A Financial Services Mentality
The party has adopted the mindset of financial capitalism, their vision is for “financial engineering instruments…to help regions and cities meet their investment needs”! They propose a bank bond to pay for private sector investment. This policy will guarantee massive profits for the bankers at the very time when working people are demanding that they be nationalised and run in the interests of the people. The paper also proposes the privatisation of government assets and of future Housing Executive rent payments through creating a “special financial vehicle” to “take advantage” of accounting rules that allow a “body outside government to borrow”. The party appears to have forgotten that this was precisely why the 1990s Tory government implemented this “off-balance sheet” accounting rule in the first place. Since then it has been instrumental in driving the widespread use of Private Finance Initiatives (PFI) with the aim of creating lucrative returns for speculators – something Sinn Féin appear to have no problem with. But the speculators who lend money to the Executive will require annual payments for inflation, interest, so-called risk, as well as their profits. Surely a better deal would be secured if new social housing was simply paid for with increased taxation?

Lower Taxes for Big Business
Sinn Fein talk up their demand for “fiscal powers…to tackle the fiscal crisis. Without the necessary tools we are simply reduced to redistributing a smaller pot of money”. But before you assume that the party is seeking to increase the burden of tax to help protect public services you might notice this hidden sentence: “The Tory party has articulated a public position around designating the North as an enterprise zone with the ability to vary [read lower] corporation tax rates. Sinn Fein believes that the British government should implement these proposals as part of a Budget Settlement.” Far from using fiscal powers to protect the public services and workers from the devastation of the cuts, Sinn Féin seeks to lower business taxes even further! The cost: £500 million a year to be paid for by further cuts and more stealth taxes.

It is an irony of history that after 30 years of divisive and fruitless armed struggle, Sinn Féin in government content themselves to implementing cuts that Margaret Thatcher could only have dreamed about. Socialists must seek to build a cross-community opposition to the cuts involving workers and those affected in the wider community – that’s the only real alternative to the Tories in Westminster and in Stormont.

 

Total
0
Shares
Previous Article

Suicide crisis a symptom of “a hopeless situation”

Next Article

Cuts bloodbath must be resisted

Related Posts

Perspectives for Malaysia

A Marxist approach
Review of Jeyakumar Devaraj's "Malaysia at the Crossroads, a Socialist Perspective"

Jeyakumar Devaraj, member of the Central Committee of Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM) and Member of Parliament for Sungai Siput, published a book on perspectives for Malaysia in August 2009. Peter Taaffe, General Secretary of the Socialist Party (CWI in England and Wales) and member of the International Secretariat of the Committee for a Workers' International, reviewed it in a letter to Jeyakumar. We are carrying a slightly edited (shortened) version of the review which deals with important questions of method, analysis and perspectives for Marxists in the struggle - to overthrow capitalism in Malaysia, Asia and worldwide.

"Malaysia at the Crossroads, A Socialist Perspective" by Jeyakumar Devaraj is available at the bookshop of the Socialist Party England and Wales or the PSM.

Northern Ireland – Assembly parties deliver cuts & sectarianism

‘Power Sharing’ Assembly delivers austerity, as sectarianism grows

2010 - Time for united working class opposition!

Published in the Winter 2009 - Issue 24 of SocialistVIEW

The prolonged row between the DUP and Sinn Fein over the devolution of policing and justice powers is just one of many political battles that could lead to the collapse of the Stormont Executive, reinforcing the need for a socialist alternative writes Gary Mulcahy.

Will Afghanistan be Obama’s Vietnam?

US AND British military chiefs have been quick to label their July offensive against the Taliban in south east Afghanistan a "success". In reality the main achievement of the British "Operation Panther’s Claw" and the US "Operation Thrust of the Sword" has been to refocus the attention of an increasingly sceptical public at home on the military quagmire and political impasse that is present day Afghanistan.

Water charges on the way

On a Daily Politics discussion on the economy in the run up to the election, Finance Minister Sammy Wilson of the DUP made it crystal clear that, in his opinion, the Assembly Executive will introduce water charges. He admitted that the charges have only been deferred, not scrapped, and went on to say that “when they are introduced” it must be on the basis of “fairness”.