ICTU leaders fail – Strike action can reverse cuts

ICTU’S SO-CALLED “plan of action” to oppose the pay cuts imposed on public sector workers is vague and doesn’t outline a clear strategy as to how the cuts can be reversed. ICTU’s Public Services Committee is attempting to do the impossible. They are trying to come up with a plan of industrial action which will have a minimal impact on their members pay and on services to the public, while at the same time putting sufficient pressure on the government to force them to overturn the pay cuts. It can’t be done. If there is to be a fight to reverse the €1 billion in public sector pay cuts, then it won’t succeed without major strike action that directly impacts on the functioning of government and the provision of public services.

Many public sector workers view the events of the last 12 months through jaundiced eyes. Trade unionists had their hopes raised on a number of occasions when the union leaders actually called major demonstrations and strikes. Yet, instead of driving home their advantage and following up these actions by escalating the strikes and mass mobilisations against a weak government, the union leadership chose the path of conciliation, “partnership talks” and compromise. What they got in return from the government was a kick in the teeth, the ending of “social partnership” and savage cuts in pay and funding of public services.

It is not surprising therefore, that many public sector workers question the purpose of taking further industrial action. This is not because they accept the pay cuts but because they have no faith in the union leaders. The dogged adherence to “social partnership” by ICTU as a substitute for a concerted campaign of strike action has directly led to the major cuts in public sector workers pay.

The culmination of this strategy that was doomed to fail was the humiliating spectacle of ICTU trying to negotiate a deal with the government to deliver fundamental “reform” in the public sector. “Reform” that would have resulted in thousands of job losses, major cuts in overtime and allowances (which many depend on to supplement poor levels of basic pay) in return for a “voluntary” 12 day lay off, in effect a 5% pay cut.

The trade union leaders’ failure to stop the imposition of the public sector pay cuts has laid the basis for a major assault by employers on pay across the private sector and in semi state companies. The government has also made it clear that they intend to impose further pay cuts in the public sector. The cuts in unemployment benefit and in particular the draconian cuts in rates for young people are preparing the ground for a cut in the minimum wage.

A major attack on the pay and living standards of every worker is now on the cards. Yet we keep being told there is no alternative – “we” need to be more competitive. According to trade union economist Paul Sweeney, “It is worth noting that Ireland still has one of the highest levels of productivity in the world. However, the last three quarters…saw the biggest fall in unit labour costs in the 30 state OECD occurring in Ireland…This again undermines Minister Lenihan’s claim that Irish unit labour costs are the highest in the Eurozone”.

The government outrageously claimed that if they had not cut public sector pay then they would have run out of money to pay wages by this spring. Yet an RTE Prime Time Investigates programme on the banking system estimates that a further €15 billion will be given to the banks this year. They can find €15 billion for the banks but nothing for public services or wages!
This fact alone is proof that all of the cuts in funding for public services and the public sector pay cuts are avoidable. The budget cuts are part of a strategy to maintain a low tax regime for big business, who if they paid tax at the same rate as PAYE workers, would be contributing an extra €10 billion this year towards the funding of public services.

Jack O’Connor has said the unions need a concerted campaign of industrial action and even spoke of the need for an all out public sector strike. Yet behind the scenes he is apparently involved, along with others, in talks with Fine Gael and Labour about resurrecting the failed “social partnership” system after the next election. Is this an indication that some union leaders have accepted defeat and are pinning their hopes on getting their “foot back in the door” with government after the next general election?

Instead of engaging in a long drawn out campaign of work to rules, selective action and lobbying of Fianna Fail TDs, from which there is little prospect of victory, there should be a united struggle that collectively involves every public sector worker.

The government and the employers have embarked on a full-scale assault to cut wages. The trade union movement needs to respond with the same type of vigour – take off the gloves and fight to defend pay and jobs.

A campaign of strike action beginning with a one day public sector strike and escalating towards and culminating in an all out strike is the type of action needed to defeat the government.
ICTU’s shambolic proposals need to be challenged by union members and activists. All workers (public and private) are faced with a choice. Either struggle to defend what you have or accept further pay cuts, job losses and stealth taxes. Further strikes and struggles are inevitable as the government and the employers are determined to drive down pay and conditions even further. To stop the sell outs and rotten deals which have been a feature of the last period workers need to get organised with the aim of gaining more control over their disputes. They need to reduce the influence of full time officials and impose the democratic will of the membership based on a bottom line of what we have we hold!

In the Irish Times on 5 January 2010, Elaine Byrne wrote:

“The recapitalisation of AIB and Bank of Ireland and the nationalisation of Anglo Irish Bank have to date cost the exchequer €11 billion. The recent RTÉ Prime Time Investigates programme on the banking system estimates that a further €15 billion will be pumped into consolidating the banking sector this year. Including the estimated €54 billion for Nama, the banking crisis has cost the taxpayer €80 billion to date.”

Previous Article

Young people didn’t cause the crisis

Next Article

Water charges on the way back Boycott the Meter – Boycott the Charge!

Related Posts

Paddy Meehan for the Assembly and Belfast City Council

Paddy Meehan is a young call centre worker and a prominent campaigner in South Belfast. In 2009 Paddy played a key role in organizing residents solidarity protests which stopped racist attacks against Romanian families on the Lisburn Rd. Paddy was able to unite the entire community to stand up to racist thugs and uniquely demanded action from the politicians to solve the burning issues of housing and unemployment in South Belfast which fuels sectarianism and racism.

Corruption at the heart of the political establishment

The jawdropping sequence of events surrounding Iris Robinson soliciting £50,000 from two millionaire property developers (the late Fred Fraser and Ken Campbell) has opened a Pandora’s Box of corruption which goes right to the heart of the political establishment.

Iris Robinson’s refusal to declare any interest when present at the Castlereagh Council meeting which awarded the tenancy to establish a café at council-owned property to Kirk McCambley, whom Robinson was having an affair with, threatens to bring down the Robinson dynasty.

Belfast Health Trust plans to ration services will put lives at risk

Health campaigner calls on unions to build for mass demonstration

The Belfast Health and Social Care Trust have announced plans to cut emergency surgery from the City and Mater hospitals and centralise the service in the Royal Victoria Hospital by 2013.

Centralising emergency surgery in the Royal Victoria can, in and of itself, potentially put lives at risk due to increased travel time for patients. However, this is just the beginning.

Poor MLAs!


Alasdair McDonnell,leader of the SDLP decided to start the year by flying in the faces of ordinary workingclass people who are struggling to make ends meet. McDonnell claimed that as an MLA, “you could findyourself at 57 or 58 years of age left on the street...if there was a reasonably generous sliding exit and some sort of a pension provisionthere, that would make sure they weren’t landed in poverty?”.