China – Women’s struggle then and now

There are important lessons from women’s struggle in Chinese history that should be studied again International Women’s Day was celebrated for the first time in China in 1924. By then, growing workers’ and women’s movements were already developing. The Hunan Women’s League was formed in 1921. By the end of that year they had pushed through provisions on women’s suffrage and personal freedom in Hunan’s constitution. The Association for Women’s Rights in Zhejiang province issued an appeal for women to join the revolution to overthrow the warlords and introduce democracy. In Shanghai, 20,000 workers in the silk spinning industry went on strike in 1923 demanding a 10-hour day and wage increases. Chen Pi-lan, who became a Trotskyist, was one of the leaders of the Communist Party Women’s League in Shanghai.

According to ‘Women in the Chinese Revolution’ by Kate Curtin, Pi-lan explained that “when the CCP formed peasant associations, women’s issues immediately came up. Some women went to the peasant unions and accused their husbands of oppressing them. Others accused their mothers-in-law of the same thing. In some parts of the countryside women’s associations were organised in order to sort out relationships within families. For the first time there were divorces initiated by women in the countryside”. When hundreds of thousands of workers fought battles against the police and army “the members of the Shanghai Women’s League stood to the fore waving their flags, and often they showed more courage than the men.” In the 1920s, the Communist Party gave its unqualified support to the women’s movement and stood at the head of the National Women’s Association, which in 1925-1927 had 300,000 members.

After the 1949 revolution in China, prostitution and infanticide was banned. A new marriage law gave women the right to property, inheritance rights and free choice regarding marriage, divorce and the care of children. The government stated that with the land reform 60 million women achieved equality with men in terms of land holdings in central and eastern China. But this movement was uneven. The Communist Party had long been led not by genuine Marxists but by an undemocratic Maoist bureaucracy, which wanted unquestioned control and saw a militant women’s movement as a threat. In 1952 they announced that women’s liberation had been achieved and dropped demands for independent struggle by women (Curtin) – a line that was then modified several times depending on what suited the regime’s interests. Maoism did not tolerate real workers’ democracy from below and for this women paid a high price. In Russia too the revolution had been betrayed and already by the early 1930s a large part of the reforms for women were withdrawn by Stalin’s bureaucratic dictatorship.

In China, the state exercises control over women’s bodies, even to the extent of forcing women to have abortions. While the law forbids this practice, it happens. Local authorities, in enforcing birth control policies carry out forced abortions even during the late stages of pregnancy. Under the Chinese government’s ‘one-child policy’, women are not allowed ‘unauthorised’ children.

According to the World Health Organisation, China is the only country in the world where more women than men commit suicide. Every year a staggering 1.5 million women try to take their own lives and 150,000 succeed. This is especially the case in the countryside where women face grinding poverty, the highest school drop-out rates, and the burden of caring for elderly relatives. The woman belonging to the man; this has been the pattern of women’s oppression for ages around the world.

Rapid industrialisation over many years, with China becoming the world’s factory, has obviously transformed living conditions for many women. Despite miserable conditions, migrating for work and being able to support themselves, and sometimes even becoming the family’s main breadwinner, has inevitably shaken up the older patriarchal structures. The most important change in becoming a wage labourer is leaving the isolation of the home and working under similar conditions to thousands of others. In this lies the possibility to organise and act collectively.

In November 2009, 3,000 women workers in Hainan province employed by the German lingerie giant Triumph went on strike. They demanded that the bosses’ withdrawal of a 700 yuan (US$ 102) bonus must be stopped. Wages in the factory were between 500 to 600 yuan per month. This multinational company closed two factories in the Philippines last summer in an attempt to crush the predominantly female trade union. The Chinese Triumph strikers got results, and the bonuses were paid out even though the women’s demand for wages to match the legal minimum was not met. In Shanghai, one year earlier, there was another example of the growing power of women workers, with a strike by 1,000 mostly young women at an electronics company also demanding their bonuses be paid. Although these strikes have so far been defensive in character, this is an important sign of nascent organisation.

On 18 October last year 2,000 women in Hong Kong celebrated the 10th anniversary of the IMWU, Indonesian Migrant Workers’ Union. was there. “We are workers, not slaves” was one of the slogans. The 250,000 migrant women in Hong Kong work mainly as domestic workers. One in four Indonesian migrants earn below the monthly minimum of 3,580 HK dollars ($462). Half are working 15 hours a day without a single day off per week. “We want the Hong Kong government to include us in its new minimum wage legislation. They want to exempt us, this is discrimination,” said one of them, a young woman called Muthi.

She and millions of women around the world need March 8 to be commemorated in the way its initiators intended one hundred years ago.

Previous Article

Hundredth anniversary of International Women’s Day

Next Article

PCS - All out to defend jobs & services

Related Posts

Civil service 2009 pay final offer

Following the rejection of an initial offer for 2009 Northern Ireland civil service pay in April, NIPSA has now received an improved final offer. The union has embarked on a 3-week consultation with their civil service branches with members attending pay meetings and voting whether to accept or reject the offer. The Civil Service Executive Committee which has a Broad Left majority has reluctantly recommended the offer to members. However we do not describe this as a good offer or even a fair one and falls far short of our 2009 claim.



The DUP are refusing to take part in Pride. Their homophobia and bigotry was further exposed this week when Jim Wells (MLA) told Gay Pride organisers that, “I find the behaviour of those who take part in this march repugnant. I do not wish to be associated in any way with this event. My position on this will not change in the future and I would politely suggest that any further requests of this nature will be a total waste of your time.”

The fact that, Jim Wells, the Deputy Chairperson of the Health Committee at the Assembly can spout such vile bigotry is testament to the fact that homophobia is still acceptable among the political establishment.

Review: Is Red Plenty possible?

The planned economy and the struggle for socialism (first published in Socialism Today)

Red Plenty, by Francis Spufford, mixes fact and fiction to describe post-second world war Russia. The author sets out to expose Stalinist mismanagement and authoritarian rule – and, by extension, any notion of socialist planning. Inadvertently, however, he also shows the great potential of socialism – if it were truly run under the democratic control of the working class. PETER TAAFFE reviews this fascinating book.

Nigeria on a cliff edge

Sharp working class policies and strategy needed to prevent total ruin

Socially and economically, Nigeria appears set for a rapid race into a bottomless pit. Presently, the impact of several years of pro-rich, anti-people policies adopted and embraced by both the military and civilian sections of the capitalist ruling elite has now driven Nigeria to the brink of an unimaginable social and political disaster. Economically, the sharpest expression of this disaster is the continued and deepening mass poverty, in the midst of abundant resources, with only a tiny proportion of the population (i.e. the top politicians, state officials and their capitalist allies) wallowing in stupendous, but needless, personal wealth.