Defend the Four: Court awards £49,000

By Glenn Kelly, Unison (personal capacity)

On Friday 9 August, the employment tribunal dealing with the Unison leadership’s illegal banning of the ‘Socialist Party Four’ from office issued its judgement as to what compensation Unison would have to pay.

The compensation follows the 2011 ruling that found the Union leadership guilty of “unjustifiable” disciplinary action against the four activists for producing a leaflet complained about resolutions being excluded from the 2007 Unison Conference.

Given that the average pay out for a worker from a tribunal is about £4,000, the tribunal’s decision to award £49,000 in total to the four shows how the union’s actions were viewed.

The court also award aggravated damages against Unison for their treatment of me, saying: “that we are satisfied that the conduct of the respondent (Unison) amounted to high-handed malicious and oppressive conduct and we decided in the case of Mr Kelly to award an additional award for aggravated damages”.
‘Dedicated trade unionists’

Agreeing the damage done to the four of us by the union, the court found all four of us as “committed and dedicated trade unionists, elected by the members and had devoted either the whole or a large part of their working life to advising representing the member and their interests at regional and national level”.

Despite this, in an attempt to diminish their actions, the union had tried to argue in the court case that the damage done to us was minimal ‘as we were Marxists and Socialist Party members and were used to political rough and tumble of political life’.

The court responded by saying that: “we do not accept that the claimants’ political beliefs and or activities made them in some way impervious or immune to hurt caused by the action of the respondents”.

Alongside the ban, we also had to face our branches being taken into regional administration. All along the union tried to say the two events weren’t related.

However, on 9 August the court rejected the unions claim saying: “it is inconceivable that there was no link between the claimants being banned and the branches being taken into regional administration.”

In reference to the raids on the branches it said: “it was done in a way to cause the maximum humiliation to the claimants”.

Given the findings of the court cases, the question still remains: who will be held to account inside Unison for spending six years attacking union activists and wasting literally hundreds of thousands of pounds of our members’ money?

Previous Article


Next Article

Zero Tolerance for Zero-hours!

Related Posts
Read More

Four-day week possible – but not without struggle

The Trades Union Congress (TUC) in Britain has called for the introduction of a four-day working week. TUC General Secretary Frances O’Grady compared this demand to previous milestone achievements such as the eight-hour day achieved in the 19th century and the two-day weekend won in the 20th century. Unfortunately, no specific time frame has been targeted other than… this century!
Read More

Tories go on the offensive against working class people

2023 looks set to be marked by a renewed upswing in industrial action as more strike ballots are being returned successfully. The National Education Union (NEU) in Britain, as well as Scottish teachers are joining the strike action. Likewise the ongoing struggles in Royal Mail, health and the Universities are set to continue.
Read More

UCU Strike – Bosses on the run!

Only two days into 14 days of planned strike action by academic staff in Queen's University, the University of Ulster and 59 universities across Britain and the front page headline of the Times ran “University chiefs split as strikes cause chaos!” Some university bosses went so far as to publicly criticise the plans to scrap defined benefit pensions and declared support for the strike.