Forbes Goes Mad About Socialist Success

By Jesse Lessinger, Socialist Alternative (CWI in US)

Kshama Sawant
Kshama Sawant

Even before the votes are fully counted and as the campaigns to protect all votes are in full swing, Forbes magazine has gone mad about a socialist being elected to Seattle’s city council. On November 11 they published Alex Berezow’s comment “Why Is a Socialist Allowed to Teach Economics?,” offering a ludicrous attack on socialist ideas (see )

If you have had enough of this kind of right-wing pro-capitalist propaganda, if you want to give Fox News and Forbes more reasons to freak out about a real socialist fighting for $15/hour, rent control, against corporate control of politics and society – this is your time to help us: We have to run a full after-election campaign to get thousands of disputed votes for Sawant protected.
Hundreds of volunteers are visiting voters to get their signature to make sure their vote is counted. This is an extra-operation to win a very close race, with Kshama Sawant ahead by a razor thin margin of 41 votes against a Democratic Party incumbent.

Anti-socialist hysteria

The hair-brained anti-socialist diatribe against Kshama Sawant from Alex Berezow is a symptom of a broader intellectual decay of US capitalism. The article, originally from, provides nothing real, clear or scientific and Berezow’s anti-red hysteria would give McCarthyites a run for their money.
He opens by admitting that economics is known as the “dismal science” and, at best, economists have come up with “something that resembles scientific knowledge.” Has Berezow even been paying attention to the last five years of entrenched economic stagnation and global turmoil?
Traditional (read capitalist) economists don’t have a clue as to the origins of or what to do about the present crisis of capitalism. They were completely blind to the trends and processes that led to the deepest economic crisis since the 1930s. On the other hand socialist economists, like Sawant, correctly predicted the current economic crisis and have put forward real solutions to get us out of this deep stagnation and recession.
Berezow regurgitates the old argument that capitalism provides the best incentive for people to work. But why is that thousands of workers in the fast food industry are taking strike action for $15 an hour wage and union representation? Isn’t it blatantly obvious that when workers like those in fast food and other services are paid crumbs and given no voice or respect in the workplace that they don’t care at all about their jobs.
If we work harder we don’t see an extra dime so where is the incentive there? The mythical ladder of economic success only has one wrung, which is broken, while we’re stuck in a basement of economic despair.
Meanwhile, the billionaire financial oligarchs who provide no useful service to society, wrecked the economy and then got bailed out, continue to sit on their gluttonous butts watching their portfolios rise. 165 years ago the argument against socialism that universal laziness would set in was answered by a student of the “dismal science” named Karl Marx when he wrote, “According to this [argument], capitalist society ought long ago to have gone to the dogs through sheer idleness; for those of its members who work, acquire nothing, and those who acquire anything do not work.” (The Communist Manifesto)
The opposite of what Berezow claims is true. By providing working people the compensation they deserve but also a real say and ownership over their work, community and society, we can harness the tremendous untapped energy, creativity, and human potential, which currently lies idle, and direct it towards rational social needs. Just take a look at Dan Pink’s research into what really motivates people to work. (
Berezow claims that the ten and thousands of working people who have been inspired by Kshama’s campaign because someone is finally speaking about the day-to-day struggle that they face, boldly raising policies that would actually improve their lives, are just being “duped.” He thinks not only do you not deserve $15 an hour but that you’re stupid to even believe you should.
Despite the utter lack of any sophistication in Berezow’s drivel, it should be seen as a warning that when socialists and working people speak out against this rotten system and demand real change we will be met by all the viciousness and contempt of the ruling elite and their hired henchmen. Instead of debating the burning issues facing our society, they attempt to silence and discredit our voices.
But we will not be silenced. We are inches away from winning a historic victory for working people and we need your help. The election is so close that we have to fight for every vote to be counted. This takes tremendous resources and additional staff so it is a matter of urgency that you donate to the campaign today.
The lose grip on reality held by commentators like Berezow is matched only by the deceit and callousness on the part of the political representatives of this broken for-profit system. But Kshama’s campaign represents a new hope that we that can challenge years of neglect and indifference and we can speak out and demand what we need. We don’t have to sit silently anymore. The time has come to rebuild a grassroots social movement in the U.S. for real change. Join us!
Donate, volunteer, join!


Berezow’s original article:

Why Is a Socialist Allowed to Teach Economics?

Posted by Alex B. Berezow November 11, 2013
Alex B. BerezowWe don’t cover economics regularly because it is not traditionally considered science. Furthermore, the field too often generates research and commentary that employs more voodoo than a witch doctor. It is largely for these reasons that economics is often referred to as the “dismal science” and why President Harry Truman wanted to meet a one-armed economist.
Still, economics can provide powerful insights on market behavior. Indeed, economists from various ideological backgrounds have managed to reach a consensus on several major issues, and from that vantage point, we can say the field has developed something resembling scientific knowledge.
One of those insights is that people respond to incentives. If I offer a teenager $50 to mow my lawn — and an extra $25 if he trims the bushes — then I can expect to shell out $75. I just offered my little helper a handsome incentive, and there’s a very good chance he’ll respond to it. This insight on human behavior is so basic and obvious that it is listed as one of the foundations of economics in Harvard economist Greg Mankiw’s textbook Principles of Economics.
Unfortunately, socialists never learned this lesson. In a socialist economy, incentives play little (if any) role. Therefore, as University of Michigan-Flint economist Mark J. Perry wrote, “By failing to emphasize incentives, socialism is a theory inconsistent with human nature and is therefore doomed to fail.”
Yet, shockingly, socialists can regularly be found on college campuses. Kshama Sawant, an economics teacher at Seattle Central Community College, openly endorses socialism. She also is running for Seattle City Council and, with the latest election returns, claims 49.5% of the vote. With many ballots left to count, she could still win.
How on earth can somebody who rejects basic academic knowledge be so close to winning a city council seat? Even more troublingly, how can somebody with her beliefs be allowed to teach an economics course? This would be analogous to allowing an AIDS denier to teach a medical microbiology course, a 9/11 truther to teach a foreign policy course, or a creationist to teach an evolution course. (Amazingly, UMass-Amherst biologist Lynn Margulis had the dubious distinction of being both an AIDS denier and a 9/11 truther!)
Just how far out of the mainstream is Dr. Sawant? She favors collectivizing Amazon. “Collectivizing” is a nice word socialists use to mean seizing assets and turning control of operations over to the government.
If Dr. Sawant’s embrace of socialism isn’t bad enough, she also endorses a terribly destructive policy called “rent control.” This policy can take various forms, but basically, landlords are not allowed to charge market rates for apartments. That might sound like a nice thing if you’re a renter, but Dr. Mankiw — citing a 1992 paper in American Economic Review — states that 93% of economists reject rent control because it “reduces the quantity and quality of housing available.” University of Chicago lecturer Charles Wheelan, author of Naked Economics, agrees:
“[I]f you asked ten economists why there is a shortage of cabs and apartments in New York City, all ten would tell you that limitations on the number of taxi medallions and rent control are what restrict the supply of these goods and services.”
I have two questions to which I will never expect to receive a rational answer.
First, why would Seattle Central Community College allow Dr. Sawant (yes, she actually has a Ph.D. in economics) anywhere near students? And second, to the citizens of Seattle, how does one of the most educated cities in America allow themselves to get duped?

Previous Article

Corruption cover-up at Stormont?

Next Article

US Socialist Sawant poised to win!

Related Posts
Read More

Imperialism in West Africa: Oppose war and capitalism!

Over the past three years a wave of military coups has hit the Sahel, the region where the southern boundary of the Sahara gives way to sub-Saharan Africa. These coups have occurred in former colonies of France such as Mali, Burkina Faso, Guinea, Chad, and more recently Niger. Gabon in Central Africa has now also followed suit.